Tuesday, April 29, 2008

I blockquoted these for you

Here is a new MC feature called Letting Things Speak for Themselves (it is the blogging equivalent of pointing at something, or photography, or blogging). This one, a poem from the latest New Yorker, was inspired by National Poetry Month, and by this funny post on Videogum, and by Nick’s very own poetry submission to the New Yorker.


Here Name Your
by Dora Malech

My friend spends all summer
mending fence for the elk to blunder

back down and the cows to drag
the wires and the snow to sit and sag

on, so all the twist and hammer and tauten
and prop amounts at last to nought, knot, tangle.

The next year he picks
up his pliers and fixes

the odds all over again. There are no
grownups, and I think that all of us children know

and play some variation on this theme, the game of all join
hands so that someone can run them open.

Then war whoops, shrieks, and laughter
and regather together

as if any arms might ever really hold.
I’m trying to finger the source—pleasure of or need

for—these enactments of resistance, if Resistance
is indeed their name. I’m trying to walk the parallels to terminus—

call them lickety-split over rickety bridge,
tightrope, railroad tie, or plank as you see fit—

trying to admit to seeing double,
innumerable,

to finding myself beset by myself
on all sides, my heart forced by itself,

for itself, to learn not only mine
but all the lines—

crow’s flight, crow’s-feet, enemy, party, picket,
throwaway, high tide, and horizon—to wait

in the shadows of scrim each night
and whisper the scene. Always, some part

of the heart must root for the pliers, some
part for the snow’s steep slope.


LOVE. IT. I’m so glad that took up space in a magazine that I pay money to receive. My favorite part was either the enjambment in the fourth stanza or the part about fingering.

Anyway, two cheers for contemporary poetry. And two cheers for blogging!

That brings me to a debate Nick and I have had many times: Which number is the funniest?

a) 2
b) -1
c) 5 or so
d) 100
e) millions

No comments: